
|
Design and Control Fluid Mechanics Solid Mechanics, Materials and Structures Thermal Processes |
|
|
|
|
B. Qualifying Examination
Every doctoral student must take the Qualifying Examination in order to be admitted into cnadidacy. The following general rules apply:
Oral Part
At the discretion of the Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Committee, an oral examination may be scheduled.
Guidelines for Ph.D. Qualifying Examination
The purpose of studying for the Ph.D. Qualifying Exams is to motivate the students, now as more mature individuals than when they started their graduate studies, to review and study their course material in an intensive environment with the intent that such a review will enable them to better understand the original material and to begin to see the larger connections between subjects and disciplines.
The purpose for taking the Ph.D. Qualifying Exams is to enable the faculty to assess whether each student has mastered the material necessary to pursue more advanced study and research. This includes mastery of fundamental concepts, physical understanding needed for modeling phenomena and processes relevant to the subjects that comprise the discipline, working knowledge of the mathematical tools needed for quantification and for solving the relevant equations, and the ability to extract practical conclusions from the results.
Even though students are required (or strongly recommended) to take a certain number of courses before the qualifying exam, there really is not a one-to-one correlation between recommended courses and contents of the exam. In each exam students are required to know certain basic topics, as described below. Many Ph.D. students join our program after they receive their M.S. degrees from other institutions and the course material covered in courses they took before coming to Rutgers may be different than what we cover here. Students are required to know the basic undergraduate material in the subjects they are examined.
Click here for a more detailed description of the rules and procedures for the qualifying exam. Following is a description of the subject material for the qualifying examination:
Design and Control
The exam in Design and Control tests the basic knowledge of students in the areas of study listed below:
Kinematics: Students should have a basic understanding of mechanism analysis and design. They should be familiar with basic approaches to mechanism kinematic analysis as well as synthesis. Students should be familiar with measures of merit such as mechanical advantage, transmission angle, and structural error. In analysis, students should know about two and three-dimensional kinematics, including Denavit-Hartenberg parameters and screw algebra. In synthesis, students should know analytical and numerical precision point approaches as well as numerical optimization-based methods.
Dynamics (including basic vibration): The student should be able to apply the basic concepts of dynamics to the modeling and analysis of particles and rigid bodies. The ability to model and analyze the following are expected: (1) Kinematics - Particles, 3D rotation of rigid bodies, interconnected bodies, and rolling; (2) Kinetics - Derivation of equations of motion using Newtonian and Lagrangian approaches; (3) Qualitative Analysis - Energy and momentum methods, as well as other motion integrals; (4) Response - Eigenvalue analysis of single and multi-degree of freedom linear vibrating systems, as well as continuous systems.
Design: Students should have developed a basic ability of converting real-life design problems into design models, applying various analytical, computational and optimization methods, generating realistic solutions and interpreting the results. A basic understanding of function-based performance criteria and constraints, of strength of materials, of the role played by material properties, and of failure and safety factors is necessary. Basic understanding of underlying concepts of different design representations, manufacturing methods, finite element methods and optimization algorithms is needed.
Mechanics of Materials: Students should know plane stress and plane strain formulations, principal stresses in two and three dimensions, beams, membranes, plates and shells, as well as basic constitutive equations.
Solid Mechanics
The student should have a basic understanding of the foundations of solid mechanics, analytical dynamics and applied mathematics. The analytical dynamics and mechanics of materials requirements are described in the previous subsection. The other two main areas of study in solid mechanics are Continuum Mechanics and Elasticity, as described below:
Continuum Mechanics: Elementary tensor analysis, Cartesian components, traction and Cauchy stress, finite and infinitesimal strain, kinematics and material rates of change, balance laws, material symmetry. Elasticity, plasticity, fracture and fluid mechanics as special branches of continuum mechanics.
Elasticity: Finite strain, elastic energy, linear elastic constitutive equations, material symmetry. Elementary solutions for extension and bending. Torsion of cylindrical rods including non-circular cross-sections, Prandtl's stress function, complex variable methods for torsion. Plane stress and strain, Airy's stress function, 2D problems in rectangular and cylindrical coordinates. Betti's reciprocal theorem, the principle of virtual work, minimum energy theorems. 3D solutions in cylindrical and spherical coordinates, point load solutions: Kelvin's and Boussinesq's problems.
Suggested References:
Y.C. Fung, Foundations of Solid Mechanics, Prentice Hall, 1965.
Y.C. Fung, A First Course in Continuum Mechanics, Prentice Hall, 1977.
L.E. Malvern, Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium, Prentice Hall, 1969.
I.S. Sokolnikoff, Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Krieger, 1983.
S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, 1969.
Fluid Mechanics
The specific objectives are to test the student's understanding of fundamental principles in fluid mechanics, as well as his/her ability to synthesize the various topics into a single global perspective on the field. In this context, understanding implies being able to derive the important governing equations, and to apply well-developed physical insight coupled with strong theoretical skills to solve complex problems.
The exam is typically given at two distinct levels. The first exam (specialist) is targeted at students intending to specialize in some aspect of fluid mechanics. The second exam (cognate) is for students whose chosen field of expertise requires some degree of understanding of fluid mechanics, but is not the central focus, such as for students specializing in the thermal sciences.
Both exams test for the student's mastery of introductory fluid mechanics concepts at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Students are asked to demonstrate their ability to derive key governing equations (mass, momentum, energy and vorticity) in both differential and integral form (where appropriate) as well as to provide exact solutions of these equations for different conditions.
The level of the specialist exam transcends the cognate exam by testing the student's detailed knowledge in specific topical areas along with his/her ability to synthesize material from different topical areas. Questions for the specialist exam, in addition to those described in the previous paragraph, are drawn from the full spectrum of fluid mechanics courses offered by the Department. In the context of testing synthesis skills and probing the student's depth of knowledge, open-ended questions combining a number of the above topics are also appropriate. The exam is structured so that the student need only demonstrate proficiency in two to three specialized topics in addition to the base knowledge covered in the two semester graduate fluid mechanics series.
Thermal Processes
This exam, like the fluid mechanics exam, is offered at two levels, one for students specializing in thermal sciences and the other for students is for students whose chosen field of expertise requires some degree of understanding of thermal sciences, but is not the central focus, such as for students specializing in fluid mechanics. The areas of study are:
Thermodynamics:
Laws of classical thermodynamics, fundamental relations, energy analysis of processes, prediction of material properties, stability and phase transitions, reactive processes, equilibrium. Introduction to statistical thermodynamics, micro-and macro-canonical approach, the Boltzman distribution, modeling ideal gases, generation of property data.
Heat Transfer:
Basic processes involving heat transfer by conduction, convection and radiation. Formulation and modeling different single and multi-dimensional processes with temperature gradients in solid and fluid media. Conjugate heat transfer with stationary and also moving boundaries due to phase change. Effect of radiation interaction at the boundaries. Effects of material properties, and scaling.
Exact, approximate, and finite difference methods of solution for basic steady and unsteady conduction heat transfer problems.
Exact and approximate solutions for basic internal and external fluid flow problems with laminar and turbulent flow. Effect of body forces in free and combined free and forced convection. Boundaries with injection or blowing, and phase change. Effect of temperature dependent properties. Compressible flow. Analysis using empirical correlations.
Radiation: Radiation analysis in enclosures without a participating medium. Directional and spectral emission and absorption characteristics of surfaces.
C. Dissertation
Dissertation Committee
For each student that passes the Ph.D. Qualifying Exams, the Graduate Director in consultation with the student's research advisor forms a committee of three faculty, one of who is the student's research advisor, from the ranks of the MAE Department, which will eventually comprise the student's Dissertation Committee. The external examiner may, but need not be, appointed at this time. Within a year of the forming of this committee, a dissertation proposal will be presented to the committee, in a public meeting, for review. This is important: The student must defend his/her proposal within a year of passing the Qualifying Exam. The prevailing opinion on this proposal will be that of the student's advisor. The other two faculty members will have an advisory role where suggestions are provided. These two faculty members will also follow the work of the student to the extent that is reasonable and warranted.
There are a number of reasons for following this procedure. The student and faculty advisor benefit by having more formal access to their colleagues. The two committee faculty members can follow the research and can make constructive suggestions long before the actual defense. This makes the committee input more meaningful and removes some of the negative aspects of providing the committee too short a time to review a substantial amount of research at the very end of the process when there is little likelihood of change. The committee would be seriously encouraged to bring in the external examiner at six to twelve months prior to the estimated completion of the student's research for similar reasons. This process in no way reduces the authority of the faculty research advisor as the lead in the research effort, its methods and goals, and in determining issues such as publications, presentations, and milestones.
Dissertation Proposal
What is a Dissertation Proposal? In principle, research begins with a study of the literature. We examine what work has been done on a topic before we decide how we are to contribute to a discipline. This process: (i) a review of the state-of-the-art, (ii) an examination where there is a lack in understanding, and (iii) a focusing on the resolution of some part of that lack, is what the Dissertation Proposal is all about.
Your advisor, with the Graduate Director, will form your Committee, minus the external examiner. You are given a maximum of one year from passing the Quals to defend your research proposal, i.e., the Dissertation Proposal, before this committee. The defense will be very similar to an MS thesis defense. This proposal is very similar, except there is no budget, to those written by your advisor when external funding is sought.
You should use the Dissertation Style format. The remaining details are up to your advisor and your committee. Your proposal should be of sufficient detail to convince your committee that you understand the problem area, are aware of the state-of-the-art, and have a well-defined problem to focus on.
Some of you have already done much of this in an informal way and therefore, need only write this as a report and then present it to your committee.
Completion of a Dissertation
Two semesters before the anticipated completion date of the Ph.D. degree the student should meet with the Graduate Director and confirm that the student has met (or is going to meet) all graduation requirements. A checklist for this purpose is provided here. Following is the procedure to be followed for the completion of a dissertation:
Rutgers Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Graduate Program Home Page
